I know, I know.
I'm just repeating what I've said before, and what Sam recently wrote.
But when I was invited (yes, personally INVITED) back to the redesigned Chowhound, I really thought there must have been a change in the air.
Sadly, I have discovered that this is patently untrue. In fact, attempting to change one's opinion about a previous review is, apparently, unacceptable. On a recent thread asking for opinions on Lulu vs. Tres Agaves vs. Chowhound, I responded to update something I had previously written about Coco500.
At some point thereafter (not sure when, exactly), my comment was deleted. I suppose it's because I said that service had improved, where all the other posters were still quick to bash it. Or maybe it's perhaps because I had linked to Gastronomie? But I thought that was OK.
Whatever the case, I'm back to saying "hasta" to Chowhound -- as a contributor, anyway. I suppose now that CNet owns them, they don't have to worry about looky-loo bandwidth issues.
Tags: Food, Food & Drink, Chowhound, CNet
Powered by Qumana